3 ms·
Knowing that jQuery ends up calling those very same functions, only often after jumping through a bunch of hoops, doesnt make me consider it a shortcut. Between
by mellow2020 7y ago
Knowing that jQuery ends up calling those very same functions, only often after jumping through a bunch of hoops, doesnt make me consider it a shortcut. Between auto-complete and copy and paste, I prefer slightly more "work" up front, and then zero needless work at runtime, than a bit of "magic" that ends up doing needless work every single time it is run.
But I have to admit, I don't care about compatibility beyond Firefox on the desktop, if I wrote stuff for a company on a deadline, or if I worked with other people on something, I would mind jQuery very little or not at all. But for my own stuff I make to spark joy, where I get to decide all of it, I want it as vanilla as I can get it.
- no_wizard 7y ago> copy and paste Bravo for admitting it. I have to say I've usually run into trouble working with copy and paste coders though. How do you make sure what you're doing this with is something you understand? I never understood this one.
- mellow2020 7y agoI just meant copying and pasting long function and variable names out of my own code elsewhere, should autocomplete somehow not apply.