4 ms·
The IT guys in the industry know very well what constitutes an E2E encryption. Those two ends must be "trusted" which means it's either you yourself - your comp
by trickstra 7y ago
The IT guys in the industry know very well what constitutes an E2E encryption. Those two ends must be "trusted" which means it's either you yourself - your computer, or the other party which you want to talk to. Everything in between is third party and must get only encrypted data. If they redefine one of the "ends" as Zoom server, that's definitely intentional, blatant, and therefore fraudulent.
- diggan 7y agoI'm not disagreeing that they are using E2E wrong, I fully agree with you there. But just because someone uses a word wrong doesn't give you any proof about their intentions. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22767447 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22767447 for further elaboration on that point. Again, it's harmful to use words incorrectly, _especially_ when it comes to E2E, so they should rightly get flak for getting it wrong. You all seem to be so sure that it was intentional though, while I've seen the same problem so many times before in the industry without it being intentional. If you do have proof it's intentional, please share it with the rest of us so we can be on the same page.