3 ms·
An "ideal" scheme is once again derailed by reality, where predictability is valued; where antennas and signal processing equipment are physical objects, that c
by fennecfoxen 7y ago
An "ideal" scheme is once again derailed by reality, where predictability is valued; where antennas and signal processing equipment are physical objects, that cost money to procure and install, and are subject to engineering limitations which limit their flexibility.
Remember, the free market is only efficient when transaction costs are low.
- awelkie 7y agoCould you be more specific? What about this proposed "ideal" scheme is infeasible (specifically the engineering limitations you mentioned)?
- tonyarkles 7y agoAs a quick example, I’ve been doing a bit of work with land-mobile radios lately (LMR). We rent a very small slice of spectrum from the government (12.5kHz wide, IIRC), and all of the radios use that frequency. They work anywhere (within the range of our license anyway). They run independent of a repeater or any kind of fixed base station. If I’m out in the middle of nowhere with my team and we’re using these radios because there’s no cell coverage, a) how would a given radio “bid” on a piece of spectrum, and b) how would the other units in the talk group know to listen to a particular frequency for my message?
- JoeAltmaier 7y agoThat's a neat problem. You may hear N other stations, but they may not hear each other at all. Its very difficult to know whom to tell about coordination information, or even how to calculate it. Solve that, even heuristically, and make a $B
- tonyarkles 7y agoI agree! It’s a very interesting distributed system problem and honestly, I might end up doing some sketching tonight. Right now it’s easy to know whom to tell about the coordination though: the Canadian government :).