3 ms·

I would love to use this instead of zoom. Any news about firefox support?

• buovjaga 7y ago
  Patches are being reviewed: https://github.com/jitsi/lib-jitsi-meet/pull/1062 https://github.com/jitsi/lib-jitsi-meet/pull/1062 Included: "Fix the order of the simulcast streams for Firefox." Subscribe to this issue to keep track of things: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/4758 https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/4758 From the latest comments you can see that Firefox upstream is also improving things.
• hirako2000 7y ago
  How come it works for me on Firefox? v70.0.1 Edit: got it, it's that particular feature still missing.
• lioeters 7y ago
  They're actively working on it - in the GitHub issue below, Jitsi devs have been engaged with the community, as recently as yesterday. 100% support for Firefox (and other non-Chrome browsers) https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/4758 https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/4758
• m-p-3 7y ago
  I use it for quick meetings on Firefox and so far it works with the limited set of features I need, despite the warning.
  • enriquto 7y ago
    Last week I could not manage to use it for a three-way conversation (after 1h of trying everything, and re-initializing the stuff several times). Sometimes the sound of one participant was missing, sometimes the video of one. When we got it to work for a subset of two people, the CPU of everybody was at 100%.
• cpncrunch 7y ago
  You might want to try Janus Gateway instead. It works fine on firefox, and is stable and reliable. https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway
• PudgePacket 7y ago
  Did a 6 person meet last night, all with video, and I was on firefox, worked fine.