3 ms·
Well the cold hard truth is that Qt Creator looked good on every system i used it in (Windows XP/Seven, Gnome, KDE) while KDevelop looks quite bad/unpolished on
by Raphael_Amiard 16y ago
Well the cold hard truth is that Qt Creator looked good on every system i used it in (Windows XP/Seven, Gnome, KDE) while KDevelop looks quite bad/unpolished on its only platform (KDE)
- sho_hn 16y agoWell, for reference, here's a screenshot of the current KDevelop release on the current KDE release with default settings for each, so people can make up their own minds: http://simplest-image-hosting.net/jpg-0-plasma-desktopud5039 http://simplest-image-hosting.net/jpg-0-plasma-desktopud5039 And FWIW, considering that KDE apps do work on and get shipped for Windows and Mac OS X, that "only platform" is a pretty broad one. Actually I can't speak to how complete the port of KDevelop's own application logic to those platforms is as I haven't tried it there, but I certainly happily use apps like Okular and Gwenview on Windows 7. Here are shots of that too, while we're at it: http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-windows http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-windows and http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-capture24 http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-capture24
- sho_hn 16y agoHere's a shot of Qt Creator for comparison, default settings as well: http://simplest-image-hosting.net/jpg-0-plasma-desktophl5039 http://simplest-image-hosting.net/jpg-0-plasma-desktophl5039 That shows some of the issues I have with it - I don't like the custom theming, especially given how inconsistently it's applied (still uses system looks for scrollbars, the menu bar doesn't fit at all, etc.).