3 ms·
I’m not a religious person but being hysterical about wanting to point fingers at believers because “they are obviously wrong” is missing the point. They may n
by Eikon 7y ago
I’m not a religious person but being hysterical about wanting to point fingers at believers because “they are obviously wrong” is missing the point.
They may not be able to prove something mystical, as you said, exists but you certainly can’t prove there’s nothing.
- gruez 7y ago>They may not be able to prove something mystical, as you said, exists but you certainly can’t prove there’s nothing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot
- jjjensen90 7y agoYour point is unclear to me, but you don't prove a negative, look up Russell's teapot: "He wrote that if he were to assert, without offering proof, that a teapot, too small to be seen by telescopes, orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars, he could not expect anyone to believe him solely because his assertion could not be proven wrong."
- threatofrain 7y ago> but you certainly can’t prove there’s nothing. Okay, but that's not a rousing defense. That's the kind of stuff you say when you want to retreat and say "stop bothering me."