I don't think most people advocating for, say, curing death through aging are advocating forced immortality. It's just a few years more- it's just not dying to

I don't think most people advocating for, say, curing death through aging are advocating forced immortality. It's just a few years more- it's just not dying tomorrow, or next year, or next decade. Yes, if you imagine an arbitrary boundless personal future, there are a lot more ways it could end up being on average a negative experience than a positive one. I've never heard anyone argue against having an exit plan for that eventuality (i.e., I've never seen anyone argue a 500-year old should be prevented from killing themselves). I don't think you would turn down a magic pill that would extend your lifespan-with-a-21-year-old's-vitality tomorrow, would you? I think all the 'immortalists' want is for everyone to live as long as they choose to, and not have the choice taken away from people as it is now.