3 ms·
Drawing the line for the behavior of what I require my children to do at "is this legal or not?" is patently a bad idea, not to mention morally confused. As ch
by lliamander 7y ago
Drawing the line for the behavior of what I require my children to do at "is this legal or not?" is patently a bad idea, not to mention morally confused.
As children get older, you of course give them more autonomy, but so long as they are your dependents, you have both an obligation and a right to set reasonable boundaries on their behavior.
I certainly explain the rationale, and when possible try to persuade rather than force behavior where possible, and also let them make bad choices so they can learn from the experience, but they don't always possess the rational capacity to think about the long-term consequences or the ability to deal with those consequences when they occur.
I require my children to brush their teeth, because a failure to do so would result in both poor health consequences for them, and a great deal of expense for me.
As for restricting access to lurid content when my children are given internet access? Absolutely. I say this as someone who had unfiltered internet access as a teenager. They do whatever they want once they get their own internet access.
- Mirioron 7y ago>As for restricting access to lurid content when my children are given internet access? Absolutely. I say this as someone who had unfiltered internet access as a teenager. They do whatever they want once they get their own internet access. I think that's the parent poster's point. You had this kind of access. Do you think you're worse off now because you had this access as a teenager?
- drdeca 7y agoI am worse off due to the access which I had.
- lliamander 7y agoI gained a lot of benefit from the internet, but not from access to lurid content.