4 ms·

I don't follow. How would it be any different than today? The children a woman has, will in turn have children. So the rate of births would be exactly the same

• cryptonector 7y ago
  Fertility would stabilize around replacement rate once life expectancy stabilized too. The number of children in a population would still go down though, as for any one woman's 1,000 year lifetime, there would be two children. Unless, of course, you mean that people who live to 1,000 would be children (immature) until they reached 180 years of age. I.e., just scale our perception of time along with our life expectancy. But merely scaling time isn't interesting. People who want to live forever want to live forever as adults.
  • xwdv 7y ago
    As adults frozen at about 25 years of age. Basically children. No one wants to be a decrepit old immortal man.
    • cryptonector 7y ago
      Right. But now we're talking about two very difficult to achieve things.