4 ms·
To summarize the research, the idea is to use X-rays like ultrasound: visualizing the elastic properties of the target instead of the density, but at higher res
by kens 7y ago
To summarize the research, the idea is to use X-rays like ultrasound: visualizing the elastic properties of the target instead of the density, but at higher resolution than ultrasound. They were able to create a 2-D image of particles in a gel in the lab.
Keep in mind that this is physic research, not medical research. They show that this imaging is possible. There are a bunch of difficult steps to making this medically useful. First, it is currently 2-D, not 3-D. It also needs to move from creating an image in the lab to a repeatable process, and then turned into a medical equipment product.
TL;DR: This is a lab demonstration of a new imaging technique in a physics journal. The title is entirely speculative. Abstract and paywalled paper here: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.35848/1882-0786/ab7e06/meta https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.35848/1882-0786/ab7e06...
- prostheticvamp 7y agoJust throwing out there: US is 2D, X-ray is 2D, MRI is 2D slices, and CT is also a series of 2D slices but you can reconstruct reasonable guesses at 3D structures with it. This being 2D doesn’t strike me as a huge drawback
- stilley2 7y agoA collection of 2D slices /is/ a 3D image. Modern CT and MRI are 3D modalities.
- prostheticvamp 7y agoReading one 2D slice at a time and calling it 3D is... not wrong. I don’t think it’s right, either. But we are now splitting hairs and not adding value.