> If you have a good suggestion on how to rapidly measure site accuracy and quality I know some VCs who would very much like to chat. I spent a few days think

> If you have a good suggestion on how to rapidly measure site accuracy and quality I know some VCs who would very much like to chat. I spent a few days thinking about it not so long ago and I have thought of something rarely mentioned. Don't get me wrong, I don't think I have completely solved the problem, just noticed it changes the perspective. If I remember well, from my user perspective, the biggest change Google introduced was the ranking by page. Yahoo used to rank by site not by page. Maybe going back to a ranking by site would help creating a good index. A site would be associated to a number of keywords, say 20 and that's it. That would give incentive to pick the keywords you want to rank for carefully and really be an expert about them instead of having SEO experts deciding which keywords they want to rank for this week and write empty TF-IDF optimized blog posts. This sort of search engine would not give you the answer to everything but it would give back power to the websites. The information retrieval process would then be 2 steps : - find a good website - find the information within the website