3 ms·
Some single-stream systems have stopped taking glass. Paper/cardboard seems to be cost-effective so there isn't a real pressure to remove that. If anything it's
by _delirium 7y ago
Some single-stream systems have stopped taking glass. Paper/cardboard seems to be cost-effective so there isn't a real pressure to remove that. If anything it's one of the few things (along with metal) that the recycling systems actually get decent recovery rates from.
The reasons for removing glass in particular seem to be: 1) it's the heaviest component, so removing it decreases transportation/processing costs, 2) after China stopped accepting exported glass, there's a lack of processors who will take it, and 3) broken glass shards contaminate more valuable things in the stream, plus damage machinery.
Plastic isn't really cost-effective either and has low recovery rates, but it's at least lighter than glass and doesn't break into shards as easily, so a lot of places still take it, if only to make people feel good.
Links: https://wamu.org/story/19/04/26/arlington-ends-curbside-glass-recycling/ https://wamu.org/story/19/04/26/arlington-ends-curbside-glas..., https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/news2/glass-containers-no-longer-required-in-curbside-recycling-program/ https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/news2/glass-containers-no-long..., https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/recycling-programs-phase-out-glass-2018/ https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/recycling-programs-ph...
- DubiousPusher 7y agoI was thinking paper not because it's not cost effective in itself, I just kind of assumed wet or soiled paper was a source of contamination for other things. I think plastic should be a priority because it seems to be the most disasterous of recyclables when it comes to environmental contamination. Taxing plastic packaging to include externalities would probably fix this.
- ip26 7y agooffice paper & corrugated cardboard are some of the higher value recycled materials.