3 ms·
I feel like, if you wanted to pick the film-photography version of Instagram, a better choice would be Polaroid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_Corporat
by smacktoward 7y ago
I feel like, if you wanted to pick the film-photography version of Instagram, a better choice would be Polaroid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_Corporation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_Corporation
Kodachrome was always preferred by serious photographers (at least until the Japanese film companies started muscling their way into the US in the mid-'80s), but Polaroid was the peoples' choice -- cheap, social and fun. People would crowd around a Polaroid exposure taken at a party, watching the image develop and commenting to each other on it. Nobody ever confused it for high quality film, but for the purposes it was put to, that didn't matter.
- armadsen 7y agoI agree. Even more directly, Instagram's early icons were pretty clearly inspired by Polaroid, with one of them even a straight up illustration of a specific Polaroid camera. See the second icon here: https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/54bb4cfce4b045585ada36f7/1464087195265-470BIQAP3J8KAOXQ878J/ https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/54bb4cfce4b045585... It's a Polaroid OneStep with Q-Light: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bb/16/a4/bb16a4b51206b9fdbc73135c6f6a5af0.jpg https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bb/16/a4/bb16a4b51206b9fdbc73135c6...
- m463 7y agoKodachrome might have arguably been the most NON-instant film you could use. It was possible to develop Polaroid in a few seconds. The next easiest was black-and-white film, which you could do in your own home. It was also possible to do normal color film (like c-41) in your own home (with difficulty), but you could also drop it by a local lab and pick it up the next day (or a few days). But Kodachrome - that required a tech tree. It had to be sent off to a special facility. There were only a few of them, which required the ability (and certification and chemicals) to develop it.