> It should not be the simple act of accessing a computer contrary to the owners terms and conditions that is a crime, but the specific acts of searching for, w

> It should not be the simple act of accessing a computer contrary to the owners terms and conditions that is a crime, but the specific acts of searching for, wilfully accessing and sharing privileged information on systems where the persons whose information you were accessing had a reasonable expectation that that information would be private. Why wouldn't that apply to some website that's using some cache exploit to probe users' browsing histories?