3 ms·
I used to think the same thing, but what about the situations where people don't sell out and just see their features copied by the corporate behemoth, wholesal
by minimalist 7y ago
I used to think the same thing, but what about the situations where people don't sell out and just see their features copied by the corporate behemoth, wholesale? That scenario seems to play out often as well (g---le+ and diaspora always come to mind).
I suppose if the goal is to just see some technology or technique or idea become more broadly adopted, this isn't a bad thing. But what about poor-implementations of a good concept (UI/UX bloat, user-hostile business models, etc.) Honestly, I'm not sure. Is this analogous to the trends that drive consolidation of firms in general?
I guess this is a round-about say of saying that selling-out is probably the most rational thing to do, but please prove me wrong.
- gizmo385 7y ago> g---le+ What is the purpose behind "censoring" Google's name here...?
- minimalist 7y agoIt's an attempt to hide from the scripts that notify people or teams when some company is being mentioned. It's helpful in some environments.