3 ms·

Actually the entirety of the onus to show anything in any way, is on you. I am not the one suggesting that huge amounts of changes need be made, including a fr

Actually the entirety of the onus to show anything in any way, is on you. I am not the one suggesting that huge amounts of changes need be made, including a fraud-ridden scheme like the current carbon credit scam, which makes me guilty, simply due to my entirely natural and necessary respiration. You want to claim that CO2 is something dangerous, and should be lumped in with radium, cadmium, mercury (all actual, true pollutants)? Prove it.

VladRussian 16y ago
>You want to claim that CO2 is something dangerous, and should be lumped in with radium, cadmium, mercury (all actual, true pollutants)? Prove it. The gamma radiation of radium and absorbtion wavelengths of CO2 [ if absorbing CO2 molecule is flying in the atmosphere it is frequently called "green house" effect, if you don't like this term we can use another - "decreasing permeability of the Earth atmosphere for radiation with wavelengths corresponding to the black body radiation with temperature 14-15C by increasing atmospheric CO2 content" ] are pretty much from the same page of Quantum Mechanics. QM couldn't be proven even to Einstein, though. So there is no way i can prove it to you. Sorry.