3 ms·
>And, if I'm understanding it correctly, that person intentionally effectively brought a deadly weapon to the workplace after being told not to. You are not un
by alasdair_ 7y ago
>And, if I'm understanding it correctly, that person intentionally effectively brought a deadly weapon to the workplace after being told not to.
You are not understanding it correctly.
Amazon told the worker to quarantine three weeks (!) after they were near another co-worker who had COVID-19.
Amazon did not tell the person with the virus to quarantine. (!)
Amazon did not tell any other worker to quarantine. (!)
Amazon only came up with the "quarantine" argument AFTER the worker led a strike that demanded better health and safety measures.
It's clear Amazon acted unlawfully in this instance, and that the quarantine argument was a pretext in order to fire someone for an action that is protected by law.