I agree with a few things you said but you're also wrong about a few things. FAANG compensation is much higher than you think. $200k/year (including stock) in

I agree with a few things you said but you're also wrong about a few things. FAANG compensation is much higher than you think. $200k/year (including stock) in the Bay Area for new grads is common. Yes, the prep for these interviews is insane but what has effectively happened (and this is supported by the article) is that companies have offloaded the selection work to the interviewee: they will only be able to pass if they are willing to do the ridiculous prep work. And yes, the interview questions have nothing to do with the job; that's not the point. Sadly, the process is often selecting for intelligent, compliant worker bees and not, what I would prefer, more creatively-inclined people. I agree with you: depending on what team you end up on, you could be asked to clock-in, crank out code, and clock-out without much creativity or input into anything. BTW, Google doesn't use brain teasers since 15+ years ago. But, there is the occasional interviewer who asks questions about trivia that only they know about. This is supposed to be banned but there's no consequences for interviewers who do this. Hiring committees (who make the decision) usually throw out these questions when they see them in the list of interview feedback that they are using to make a decision. Re: age. I worked on a team at FAANG that has tried very hard to hire folks with industry experience and we haven't found any resistance from interviewers to that. However, when talking to potential interviewees, we have found that very few are willing to subject themselves to the interviewing process for the reasons that you've outlined above. I don't blame them.