5 ms·
It's the most likely explanation, despite Amazon's obfuscations.
by amazoniancrooks 7y ago
It's the most likely explanation, despite Amazon's obfuscations.
- koheripbal 7y agoReally? Because the employee admits that he went to work despite being exposed to a covid-19 person, and despite being ordered not to. Those facts are not even in dispute.
- jhayward 7y agoHe was exposed 18 days before he was ordered to quarantine. Please do not try to say that there is some factual basis.
- koheripbal 7y agoSo? He did not get a covid-19 test, so for all Amazon knows, he's a carrier. There are plenty of lightly-symptomatic people who are ill and contagious for longer than 14 days.
- fzeroracer 7y agoWeird how no one else around him was quarantined. If he was contagious, then why didn't they quarantine everyone he was in contact with as well? Maybe because it was bullshit and retribution on Amazon's part.
- koheripbal 7y agoThat is what he claims. If you only believe one side of the story - then obviously you'll side with that side.
- Craighead 7y agoWhy are you so set on obfuscation?
- GavinMcG 7y agoNo one else who was exposed to that person was ordered not to. This employee was singled-out.
- orestarod 7y agoYou omitted some facts, like that he was quarantined 18 days after the contact, and no one else who also came in contact was quarantined
- radcon 7y agoYou should really take the time to learn all the facts before wrongly blaming the worker.
- sigzero 7y agoOr the company...