4 ms·
> Going to base 10 is a step backwards because 10 has so few factors. The meter would have been massively easier to use had it been base 12 or 60. Only when yo
by roelschroeven 7y ago
> Going to base 10 is a step backwards because 10 has so few factors. The meter would have been massively easier to use had it been base 12 or 60.
Only when you also use that same base for everything else too. The decimal system works so well because it uses the same base as the number system we use (almost) everywhere.
And actually I don't really think the lack of divisors is really a problem in base 10. It may be different if you're used to imperial units, but when using the decimal system you don't think in fractions all that much. You either use more places after the decimal point, or move to a smaller unit.
- gumby 7y agoWell at the time the meter was designed, base 12 was quite common for money and measurement. I have lived in an Imperial system country, the modified version used in the USA, and multiple metric countries as well as using a mixture of cgs (SI) and mks depending on what work or study I was doing and still, for customary activity, find a dozen the most convenient. When doing science it doesn’t matter.