3 ms·
I don't believe that is true. If you look at the history of the world you'll find that security is rarely enough of a priority for anyone for it to receive real
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y ago
I don't believe that is true. If you look at the history of the world you'll find that security is rarely enough of a priority for anyone for it to receive real attention. I see no reason for computing to change that trend.
- pjmlp 7y agoIt is a priority when liability and law suits come into play. Speaking of history, > if a builder build a house for some one, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built fall in and kill its owner, then that builder shall be put to death. -- Code of Hammurabi, Babylon. Naturally, we shouldn't go to such extremes.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoThe devil is all in how one defines "properly". I've seen a bit of what passes for bureaucratically defined security policy and I'm not impressed. It is largely an exercise in checking boxes for liability reasons and nothing more.
- z3phyr 7y agoIs there a house or a castle that has not eventually fallen to dedicated siege by a determined adversary?