3 ms·
You make a useful point about older definitions and/or the world of HIPAA, and nothing else you say dilutes or undermines that. However, I take issue with your
by braythwayt 7y ago
You make a useful point about older definitions and/or the world of HIPAA, and nothing else you say dilutes or undermines that.
However, I take issue with your opening ad hominem abuse. People are looking for abuses of trust. That has nothing to do with “being mad at zoom.” That has everything to do with uncovering dishonest behaviour that is detrimental to the industry.
You positioning it as some kind of emotional crusade does a disservice to people who care about important matters like informed consent.
All that being said, the factual information you shared is valuable, and I thank you for it.
- threatofrain 7y agoThe “fact” that E2E has an older meaning in industry seems very hard to chase down right now. We also have the problem that if we accept this as honest or acceptable marketing language, then Apple and Google should be allowed to engage in similar standards of marketing language.
- braythwayt 7y agoI do not think Zoom are being honest about this matter. What they are is “encrypted in transit.” I appreciate that there may be %REASONS% that E2E is unachievable given the feature set they wish to provide, but to me, that juts means they should be up front. “All Zoom communications are encrypted-in-transit. We do process them on our servers to provide features like X, Y, or Z.” Would they lose even one sale if they said this?