3 ms·
I think OP is suggesting that we change the definition of radian, not Pi.
by martincmartin 7y ago
I think OP is suggesting that we change the definition of radian, not Pi.
- Ono-Sendai 7y agoit's a bit ambiguous. Of course the radian has that definition for a particular reason, 1 radian being the angle such that the arc length equals the radius.
- SamBam 7y agoI don't believe substituting tau for 2-pi requires redefining either pi or radians. Rather it simply changes what you say you are multiplying by: instead of a circle being 2-pi radians, it's tau-radians. These are both saying the same thing, without changing pi or radians.