Again: This is not exclusive to China, the WHO has also acted in the US's interest, not only on territorial issues but way past those [0] So the question is ra

Again: This is not exclusive to China, the WHO has also acted in the US's interest, not only on territorial issues but way past those [0] So the question is rather: Would having no WHO at all be better than the WHO we have? Who or what would replace it while guaranteeing they are not running into exactly the same problem? The only way around that would be by putting some individual country in charge, but that way you would only bake the bias in by design. [0] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/oct/13/world-health-organisation-iraq-war-depleted-uranium https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/o...