3 ms·
I wish I could think of a leveled way to speak my mind but gosh, there's something about all this that really makes me want to throw up. The idea of adding a t
by d33 7y ago
I wish I could think of a leveled way to speak my mind but gosh, there's something about all this that really makes me want to throw up.
The idea of adding a tiny little button that makes a sound is innocent. It's a single button after all, isn't it? The thing is, once you share this idea, it has a risk of going to all of the pages. Websites everywhere are already full of distractors that make them annoying to browse for people with limited attention. Once you also add sounds, you might hit several problems you might have not thought of:
1. the tab is opened in the background and the user is trying to find the one that's using the speaker,
2. the volume is mismanaged because some other tab is playing their sounds too silently and yours will make the user's ears explode,
3. (probably some more that I hadn't thought of)
At first it just felt like a chunch, but then I saw another IMHO not-so-great idea coming from the user - the sticky navbar at the top is partially transparent, effectively taking even more screen estate. Probably looks shiny, but also makes your website hard to read. It really does feel like some hostile design.
It really looks like we're back to 90s', with a new generation of equivalents of <marquee> tags, annoying GIFs, mismatched colors and "still in development" signs. Thing is, this generation is sugar-coated and seems shiny at first, until you realize that every single web 4.0 page is making you nauseated. After all, it's legitimate to put on a GDPR consent overlay covering 90% of your smartphone and do other shitty moves other people do anyway, right? Though I have to admit I appreciate that this at least this one wasn't to be found on your website.
I mean, excuse the rant... as much as I appreciate open sourcing your work and hoping to improve something on the net, consider effects on users' sanity this change will bring. In the meantime, I wish I could anti-star your project, as an example of where I don't want the web to go.
- savolai 7y agoIt appears to me that you are very strongly projecting your fears based on past experience into the future. This can already be managed at the browser layer (we didn't use to have a mute control on the tab before), and those controls will likely be tightened in the unlikely case that this still gets out of hand. As mentioned by OP, please don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Web experiences aren't designed like they were in the wild west of the nineties anymore. This is for very specific kinds of experiences - as you know, the web is an app platform nowadays, so certain experiences can clearly benefit from this without ruining anyone's day. I actually agree with you about the sticky navbar - though also with caveats. The core point of all UX design is context. In some situations you have the real estate to play with and the sticky navbar can actually support more fluid navigation. When there is less screen real estate, you should be responsible and detect it. Not everyone will. That's okay, they will pay the price every bad design pays in the market - loss of customers.
- hazz99 7y agoGod forbid I want to create a little game with sound effects using React. This is a great little tool!
- Kaze404 7y agoI agree. We should also remove the img tag and the entirety of CSS. They can be used to make the user experience worse (according to me and no one else), so they shouldn't exist.