Oh, Republicans are against net neutrality, so we should be for it, right? If there's one dominant theme I've seen over the years when politics rears its ugly

Oh, Republicans are against net neutrality, so we should be for it, right? If there's one dominant theme I've seen over the years when politics rears its ugly head in an online discussion, it's that Republicans = Corporations (Evil) Democrats = Workers (Wholesome goodness) Now, it's entirely possible that those statements are true 100% of the time, but isn't it much more likely that there are exceptions to them, and if you're intellectually honest, you can acknowledge them? I'm not sure if Google results are a trustworthy source, but look up "corporate donations by party" and you'll see countless examples of corporations taking advantage of whatever party is in power. So you must acknowledge that neither party is completely beholden to "wholesome goodness". Whichever side wins in the net neutrality debate, some corporations will lose, and others will win. If net neutrality needs to be enforced, it means that politicians will hold more power. Do we really want to keep giving those people more power, especially over something that's pretty free at the moment? Give more power to the same people who just renewed the Patriot Act?!