5 ms·
Battlefield V likes as much CPU power as it can get. But it also likes GPU... There is a free to play game Armored Warfare (crysis engine?), which I genuinely
by alecmg 7y ago
Battlefield V likes as much CPU power as it can get. But it also likes GPU...
There is a free to play game Armored Warfare (crysis engine?), which I genuinely used to test stability of my cpu. 8 threads fully loaded and probably with some form of AVX.
Reviews of upcoming Mount&Blade also note how it loads 16+ threads (mostly for NPC on battlefield).
Arma3 was notorious for being bound by single thread performance and low latency memory.
- LoSboccacc 7y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw_RH0RQ2oA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw_RH0RQ2oA on a old midrange i5 6500 b5 does a solid 30+ fps on ultra and cpu load doesn't top out so I find the claim that it needs a top of the line cpu very dubious. I'll try armored warfare since it's free.
- LoSboccacc 7y agoso just tested out armored warfare and at full had maximum quality I get 60fps with 70% cpu utilization on a i5 6500 with the rx570 gpu
- alecmg 7y agoIf you are interested in cpu being utilised, should lower graphics setings from ultra. On ultra GPU is the main bottleneck. Try same on Low settings