4 ms·
yeah so it just does 80-90 fps? I'm not talking about "any difference", I'm talking games right now that require a high end cpu, since everyone upward in the th
by LoSboccacc 7y ago
yeah so it just does 80-90 fps? I'm not talking about "any difference", I'm talking games right now that require a high end cpu, since everyone upward in the thread was claiming gamers need top end cpu, and I can't think of a game that stutters with a mid range one.
also, the fps reduction seems more in line with the low end intels having less pci lanes, and not the game being cpu capped.
- tracker1 7y agoUnless you're a competitive gamer, and young with very good vision, keeping above 100fps at 1440p or better, you're very unlikely to notice the difference. Very few people genuinely notice the difference. I ran a 3600 while waiting for a 3950X, and if I had it to do over, would probably have just gone 3900X to start with... For the most part, I don't notice the difference, only after I'm running a couple databases and a few services that are active to I even come close to seeing a difference in general use. I know GPU and Monitor options are similar, and CPU/GPU combination in terms of balance are important. Unless you're going RTX 2080 or higher, then it's much less of a difference in general use anyway.