3 ms·

We Should Regulate Ridesharing Like Buses and Restaurants

14 points by ceohockey60 7y ago

opportune 7y ago
Bad article, the only specific regulation they even mention supporting is "cleanliness" as if most uber/lyfts aren't clean already, more than buses at least, which they are comparing them to. And how are uber/lyft regulations even related to restaurants. Stop upvoting this blogspam
throwawayjava 7y ago
Those are called taxis.
- Hokusai 7y ago
  The regulation already exists, ridesharing companies just decided to break the law and challenge the definition of "employee" and "taxi" because ridesharing companies have an app. That was weird from the begging. All the gig economy is just based in the idea that companies that do business thru an app doesn't need to follow established laws.
  - SllX 7y ago
    They were bad laws that deserved and earned open defiance. All people care about is getting from Point A to Point B in a quick, reliable and safe manner. People don’t care if the driver has an expensive medallion that makes them a member of a government-sanctioned mafia, if the driver of the car is willing to fulfill the passenger’s request in exchange for money. When you make the request for a private car to take you somewhere, you’re putting your life in the driver’s hands for the duration of the ride. The medallion and privileges don’t make a difference, but they can make the difference in the availability of cars in your vicinity.
    - Hokusai 7y ago
      > All people care about is getting from Point A to Point B in a quick, reliable and safe manner. Drivers also care about having a safe work environment, reasonable working hours and a fair pay. Capitalism is not just about consumers, but about consumers and producers. Apps push employees to accept ever lowering salaries to achieve that "cheap trips" and to renounce to their rights as employees to increase "availability". Labour laws were created to address this situations and should not be ignored. How would you solve these problems? > The medallion and privileges don’t make a difference, but they can make the difference in the availability of cars in your vicinity. Many cities require tests, background checks, etc. to get a taxi driver license. Apps seem to have lowered that standards. So, the opposite - less safe travel - could be the actual reality. I think that your statement needs some extra proof.
gok 7y ago
> Where the current taxi regulations fail, and thus should not be replicated, is that it artificially lowers supply via the so-called medallion system Many cities regulate restaurants like this too, by rationing liquor licenses.

14 points by ceohockey60 7y ago

Bad article, the only specific regulation they even mention supporting is "cleanliness" as if most uber/lyfts aren't clean already, more than buses at least, which they are comparing them to. And how are uber/lyft regulations even related to restaurants. Stop upvoting this blogspam

throwawayjava 7y ago

Those are called taxis.

Hokusai 7y ago
The regulation already exists, ridesharing companies just decided to break the law and challenge the definition of "employee" and "taxi" because ridesharing companies have an app. That was weird from the begging. All the gig economy is just based in the idea that companies that do business thru an app doesn't need to follow established laws.
- SllX 7y ago
  They were bad laws that deserved and earned open defiance. All people care about is getting from Point A to Point B in a quick, reliable and safe manner. People don’t care if the driver has an expensive medallion that makes them a member of a government-sanctioned mafia, if the driver of the car is willing to fulfill the passenger’s request in exchange for money. When you make the request for a private car to take you somewhere, you’re putting your life in the driver’s hands for the duration of the ride. The medallion and privileges don’t make a difference, but they can make the difference in the availability of cars in your vicinity.
  - Hokusai 7y ago
    > All people care about is getting from Point A to Point B in a quick, reliable and safe manner. Drivers also care about having a safe work environment, reasonable working hours and a fair pay. Capitalism is not just about consumers, but about consumers and producers. Apps push employees to accept ever lowering salaries to achieve that "cheap trips" and to renounce to their rights as employees to increase "availability". Labour laws were created to address this situations and should not be ignored. How would you solve these problems? > The medallion and privileges don’t make a difference, but they can make the difference in the availability of cars in your vicinity. Many cities require tests, background checks, etc. to get a taxi driver license. Apps seem to have lowered that standards. So, the opposite - less safe travel - could be the actual reality. I think that your statement needs some extra proof.

gok 7y ago

> Where the current taxi regulations fail, and thus should not be replicated, is that it artificially lowers supply via the so-called medallion system Many cities regulate restaurants like this too, by rationing liquor licenses.