4 ms·
I just went through the process of setting up GH Actions to replace Circle CI for a Rails app. It was depressingly inflexible, considering that GH is a Rails ap
by prh8 7y ago
I just went through the process of setting up GH Actions to replace Circle CI for a Rails app. It was depressingly inflexible, considering that GH is a Rails app, and I would have expected it to be straightforward.
I have done elaborate pipelines in Gitlab, and echo the thoughts of it being lightyears ahead.
- CameronNemo 7y agoI don't think there is any reason to believe that github itself uses github actions for its ci/cd process. They must have had something in place before actions came on the scene, and even if they are migrating to actions it would likely be a long process.
- prh8 7y agoI would just expect that if they want it to be a major feature, to dogfood it themselves. If it would be a long process to migrate, then how could they expect anyone else to migrate with the state of the feature?