3 ms·
>So, because some (unspecified, unnamed) experts weren't able to predict the future with perfect accuracy, we should give equal credence to "random people" inst
by fiblye 7y ago
>So, because some (unspecified, unnamed) experts weren't able to predict the future with perfect accuracy, we should give equal credence to "random people" instead?
That wasn't my takeaway.
My takeaway is that if you have some intuitive sense that shit's about to hit the fan and authorities keep telling you to stay calm and don't take any special precautions, all while danger is clearly growing, it's best to lean towards following your intuitions gradually just in case things ramp up. You shouldn't buy 10000 rolls of toilet paper, but all those people who thought, "Hmmm, maybe I should buy some masks and a couple extra bottles of hand sanitizer. Maybe not visit the movie theater anytime soon as well" while authorities were saying "Go to work and be normal. Masks are useless"... well, they were right and it would've been better to take those then "unnecessary" precautions.
Reminds me of people talking about government surveillance pre and post Snowden. If you wanted to encrypt all your messages and avoid Facebook, etc, you were a conspiracy nut because it was impossible to surveil everything. Overnight it became "Of course they monitor everything. Why wouldn't they? But we have end-to-end encryption now and we can completely trust it."
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]