Neither of these are scientific conclusions — they’re philosophical positions built around an interpretation. The sloppy way people present the Copenhagen inte

Neither of these are scientific conclusions — they’re philosophical positions built around an interpretation. The sloppy way people present the Copenhagen interpretation as a scientific conclusion is likely what’s stalling science: it’s fundamentally built on an extraneous assumption, but everyone pretends their assumed interpretation is a conclusion. We’re not gonna get progress until people assuming an extraneous assumption drop it and redo the last couple generations of physics to not depend on it.