2 ms·
There were four options given in the Wikipedia article, which are: 1. retaliate with nuclear weapons; 2. not retaliate; 3. use his or her own judgement; or
by antasvara 7y ago
There were four options given in the Wikipedia article, which are:
1. retaliate with nuclear weapons;
2. not retaliate;
3. use his or her own judgement; or
4. place the submarine under an allied country's command, if possible. The documentary mentions Australia and the United States.
To me, it seems like the order that I would give those options in would be 4,3,2,1. This is because the most sensible option would be to listen to your country's allies (as they are likely to have Britain's best interests in mind). The second best option is to trust the crew, as the situation that resulted in an entire governmental destruction probably wouldn't respond well to any blanket statements like 1 and 2. Option 2 makes the next amount of sense because defaulting to no nuclear weapons is generally a smart policy. What do you believe should be the correct order?
- p2detar 7y ago1 and then 4
- benjohnson 7y agoOption 2 makes quite a bit of sense but only if your opponent doesn't think you've necessarily selected it.
- thisrod 7y agoI'd go with 5. Write one of each letter, and assign them to the submarines in a double-blind manner, so that no one knows what will happen. The point of terrorism is to terrify, as they say.