4 ms·
> The numbers are probably not accurate, but there is no place where the numbers are accurate. There's a huge difference between accuracy and unadulterated dec
by malandrew 7y ago
> The numbers are probably not accurate, but there is no place where the numbers are accurate.
There's a huge difference between accuracy and unadulterated deception. If the numbers are off by 10%, you can claim it's inaccurate, but if the numbers are off by a lot more, it starts moving into deception territory. Right now, assuming the stories about urns being delivered to funeral homes are accurate, it sounds like numbers might be off my 2x or more. That's deception.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- rfoo 7y agoMaybe. But it is really hard to find an explanation on why every medical statistics (severe rate, hospitalization rate, death rate, average time in hospital, average recovery time, etc) seems to hold true and verified by other countries, and they can still fake their death count (and only death count). On the other hand, the number of urns being delivered to funeral homes can be easily explained. For example, the urns story talks about a fact, the amount of empty urns being delivered to funeral homes exceeds death count. But selling urns is marketized and people could pick their preferred combination of style, size and price, so this can be well explained. The story then goes ahead and matches this fact-based but pointless number with "random users on social media claims 3500 urns will be delivery daily during next two weeks". I mean, that's smelly.
- throwaway_pdp09 7y ago> seems to hold true and verified by other countries Sure they were.
- rfoo 7y agoMind giving an example of what doesn't match?