3 ms·
Given your submissions to HN I'd say just go with whatever you're interested in, it's bound to be good. ;-) As for myself, anything in re: compiling functiona
by carapace 7y ago
Given your submissions to HN I'd say just go with whatever you're interested in, it's bound to be good. ;-)
As for myself, anything in re: compiling functional and/or stack-based languages; and DSLs for GUIs.
Cheers!
- kick 7y agoAPL compilation and interpretation by translating to F83VEC; Naugle https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/22415.22032 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/22415.22032 Here's a double-hitter: compiling a functional language (APL) to a stack-based language (FORTH).
- carapace 7y agoawesome - - - - I found a couple of interesting tidbits: Computer programming as an art, Donald E. Knuth https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/361604.361612 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/361604.361612 Prolog - the language and its implementation compared with Lisp, David H D Warren, Luis M Pereira, Fernando C. N. Pereira https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/872734.806939 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/872734.806939