2 ms·
Of course they do. Of course they are. The simplest code change turns the code in to a monadic/functor soup.
by dmitriid 7y ago
Of course they do. Of course they are.
The simplest code change turns the code in to a monadic/functor soup.
- agentultra 7y ago... and if you program in Haskell that's exactly what you want. Programming with these abstractions is common and well supported in Haskell.
- whateveracct 7y agoGiven what the examples are doing (describing inputs) I don't see how you solve it ergonomically without higher kinded types, which in turn leads to functors etc.