3 ms·
Surgical masks are pretty good at protecting the wearer from droplets too. It's the fine aerosols where they're much worse than a surgical mask stopping maybe
by Symmetry 7y ago
Surgical masks are pretty good at protecting the wearer from droplets too. It's the fine aerosols where they're much worse than a surgical mask stopping maybe 80% of virus-sized particles where N95 masks tend to stop 99%+.
EDIT: Remember, though, that you can still be infected through exposed eyes, having virus on your hands and touching your face when taking off the mask, etc. Also, there was some evidence for rare cases of what looked like aerosol spread with the original SARS. In his recent interview on This Week in Virology Ian Lipkin mentioned a study in Beijing in the SARS outbreak where people with consistent mask use saw infections Ian Lipkin by 70% compared to no mask use. That's good but it isn't immunity.
- supermatt 7y ago>95%, which is why they are called N95.
- Symmetry 7y agoThey're guaranteed to stop 95% of the hardest to stop particulates which actually tend to be somewhat larger than viruses.
- supermatt 7y agoYes, i was correcting you on your statement of 99%+. Its >95% of 0.3 micron particles, but as coronavirus is smaller it would be LESS than that - not more).
- ejolto 7y agoLooks like you're right surgical masks does give the wearer some protection.