> The company would also take half of the $500 stipend allotted for dependents under the bill. Oh wow. If I put morals aside, I almost see how execs rationalis

> The company would also take half of the $500 stipend allotted for dependents under the bill. Oh wow. If I put morals aside, I almost see how execs rationalise keeping their employees wages, "keeping the business stable", etc.. How in the world can you justify taking the kids payments as well?