> or did you not read it through to the end? Have you asked why he should feel okay about it? The parent comment explicitly says context was ignored. He commi

> or did you not read it through to the end? Have you asked why he should feel okay about it? The parent comment explicitly says context was ignored. He committed genocide/xenocide because he was literally being deceived and then spends the next 2 books regretting and making up for a move he wasn't responsible for. The literal example here would be playing any video game but instead of it just being a game you were literally killing whatever the game is about. In that case, wouldn't you feel that you were wrongly deceived? That you're not truly a killer? But in your eyes and the article's... you absolutely are a killer. 100% responsible and the book is wrong for teaching otherwise. Pretty obtuse to think hold such a belief.