3 ms·
Not parent, but I think their argument is that this lib doesn't implement a glob interface so calling it a glob alternative is misleading, i.e. one cannot easil
by lhorie 7y ago
Not parent, but I think their argument is that this lib doesn't implement a glob interface so calling it a glob alternative is misleading, i.e. one cannot easily replace a globbing library with this if they expose the glob DSL as an interface. It's more accurate to say that your lib is a recursive-readdir alternative.
- thecodrr 7y agoIn that case, fair enough. But no reason to be dishearted, we can always make "fdir-glob" that has globbing built in :D but you are right, not an easy* alternative but still an alternative.