4 ms·
The stats for this are all over the place. Speaking for the UK, no distinction at all is made between died of cononavirus and died with coronavirus. We've had a
by hanoz 7y ago
The stats for this are all over the place. Speaking for the UK, no distinction at all is made between died of cononavirus and died with coronavirus. We've had a University of Oxford study claiming that 50% of us have already been infected (a figure so outlandish you might wonder if it was rather a University in Oxford) in which case we should expect the died with figures to be a great deal more already, and what's more that herd immunity should be taking the pressure of the system any week now. But I can't help but feel this belief in hidden large denominator is wishful thinking.
- nicoburns 7y ago50% does seem outlandish, but from what I can see, the numbers infected are a lot lot higher than officially reported. I would go as far as to say that the majority of cases aren't being reported, because almost nobody without severe symptoms has access to testing.