3 ms·
Do you think that's enough to account for a 146 to 6 difference in deaths per million between Spain and Germany?
by goatlover 7y ago
Do you think that's enough to account for a 146 to 6 difference in deaths per million between Spain and Germany?
- ekianjo 7y agoIn Italy the hospitals were overwhelmed so you should expect the mortality to increase very fast when you can't even give basic treatment to patients in need. The same thing happened in Wuhan and that led to massive death toll. But as I said, many variables at play and we will surely have a better understand of what mattered the most to prevent mortality.
- coldtea 7y agoAfter you run out of ventilators the sky is the limit when it comes to deaths. When you still have ventilators, only a few very elderly/unlucky die... So a country with 10,000 cases and 1,000 ventilators can have 20 deaths, and another with 10,000 cases and 500 ventilators might have 400 -- if of the 10,000 cases in both 520 need ventilator... (and some die, whether with ventilator or not, but many wouldn't if they had ICU/ventilator treatment).
- scarmig 7y agoMedical system capacity and utilization explain the vast majority of the variation in mortality among different countries, after accounting for stage of the epidemic. When things are not above capacity, mortality is 0.5% or less. After reaching capacity, mortality jumps 10x or more. Age distribution can only account for variations within, at most, a factor of two.
- goatlover 7y agoSo Spain's (and France's to a lesser degree) medical system got overwhelmed that much faster than Germany's or the UK's?
- marvin 7y agoThey might have been very late with testing. I know this was barely on the radar in France even 2-3 weeks ago. MRSA has also been suggested as a component.
- petertodd 7y agoYou'll need to back up the claim that "only a few very elderly/unlucky die" What % of people actually survive after being on a ventilator? Because I've seen various studies and anecdotes of this for C19 specifically, with results ranging from "basically no-one" to "80%, at least temporarily, but hardly anyone is actually out of hospital yet so maybe they're going to die later". Beyond C19, this study suggests roughly something like 50% long-term survival IIUC: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26003390 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26003390 Ventilators are invasive things that themselves can do lung damage. Fairly common for people to choose not to go on them in end-of-life directives.
- naveen99 7y agoMortality from ARDS is 50% even with ventilators. Source: wife is a pulmonologist and I am a radiologist.
- petertodd 7y agoAre there other reasons why C19 patients would need ventilators? Or is ARDS the main reason? Is that mortality rate consistent across different underlying causes?
- naveen99 7y agoARDS is the main reason. 40% mortality from just ARDS. Mortality goes up with covid19, age, sepsis, and renal failure.