3 ms·
I see a lot of people here saying how they "get burnt" by unexpected increase in their bills, because some guy who was supposed to manage the cloud made a mista
by s1k3s 7y ago
I see a lot of people here saying how they "get burnt" by unexpected increase in their bills, because some guy who was supposed to manage the cloud made a mistake. That's not the real burn, the real burn is when you pay $8K a month on cloud services for apps that could run on a laptop in a basement. And you pay that monthly, for years. And before devops guys slash me with "scaling", "fault tolerance", "redundancy" and what not, remember that your little website isn't a multi million user app and all the issues that you think are fixed by simply moving to the cloud can also be fixed by running your app on a laptop (for free).
I used to handle infra for a client a few years ago (the stack was built by another employee before I got there) and it always amazed me why these people pay $10-20K every month to AWS for their app with 500 users a day. Needless to say that AWS was also causing a lot of headaches with their instance management, network maintenance and service unavailability. I know cloud is cool, but business should probably think twice before going for it.
- RangerScience 7y agoYou can use the cloud without your tech being deployed like a cloud. Heroku is a good example of this; very easy (and very cheap) to just get something up, and expandable from there. You don't start out needing all the cloud fancy, and you can use "the cloud" just by using the parts you DO need.
- gitgud 7y agoVery true, some companies boast about 10,000 registered users. When in reality there's only 100 daily active users... I think the problem is that companies want to appear bigger than they are. Saying they use AWS Cloud Stuff is a selling point to investors who have a distorted understanding of how scaling works... The cloud service companies are marketed to entice people into buying services they don't need... yet/ever