3 ms·
What in this very even-handed and factual post could possibly be construed as a “flame”? Just because this commenter is engaging with an interlocutor who obviou
by iron0013 7y ago
What in this very even-handed and factual post could possibly be construed as a “flame”? Just because this commenter is engaging with an interlocutor who obviously is flaming doesn’t mean that they themselves are. That’s just the all-too-familiar “both sides” fallacy.
- dang 7y ago"You simply can't accept the number of 2 million deaths because it's outside of your experience." "Do you think the virions will suddenly decide that they don't feel like infecting anyone else?" Note how I said "repeatedly". There are other swipes elsewhere in the thread, and a pattern of doing that in the past that we've had to warn about.