4 ms·

Google image search changed drastically recently. Have you searched for (NSFW!) "podesta art" and "jimmy comet instagram"? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails

Google image search changed drastically recently. Have you searched for (NSFW!) "podesta art" and "jimmy comet instagram"? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37543 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37543

meowface 7y ago
And?
- jakeogh 7y ago
  Is that a "no, I have not reviewed Jimmy Comet's instagram"?
  - meowface 7y ago
    I have reviewed it and see no issue with it, or with any of the other Pizzagate claims. I believe Pizzagate is a complete hoax. As is "9/11 truth", which you have listed in your profile.
    - jakeogh 7y ago
      Ya totally normal tagging that baby pic #chickenlovers. Nothing odd at all about the "49th most powerful person in DC" tagging an infant #hotard. People should review the full archive, and his comments. RE distraction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21057230 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21057230
      - meowface 7y ago
        That's two posts you've made now saying that people accusing things of being conspiracy theories or presenting conspiracy theories are themselves in fact conspiracy theories to confuse people from learning the truth. Ok. Let me guess, I'm also part of the conspiracy? 9/11 wasn't an inside job. Comet Ping Pong isn't associated with pedophilia. The guaranteed dozens of other conspiracy theories you believe (Sandy Hook, Clinton body count, FEMA death camps, probably climate change denial) are also untrue. There's a reason why belief in one conspiracy theory almost always leads to belief in most or all of them, and why others don't want to try to debate with people such as yourself.
        jakeogh 7y ago
        Excellent example of confirmation bias hacks. Note how you avoid the actual subject, and instead make it personal, and (without evidence) are sure of what I "believe". I explained why and how that works in the link I provided. Note again your reflexive use of that term. Is it normal for a man to tag an infant picture he posted #hotard? What are #chickenlovers?
        meowface 7y ago
        It's a very time-consuming task to point-by-point respond to every claim made by a person who dishes out near-limitless wild, extremely shocking accusations which are only ever taken seriously in essentially "underground" places, like this ghost of a comment sub-thread. There are often a gish gallop of dozens or more. It's the same process, be it a Holocaust denier, flat Earther, Sandy Hook false flag believer, 9/11 inside job accuser, or Comet Ping Pong child rape accuser. And yes, I do think it's fair and accurate to lump all of these together in terms of the faulty reasoning used to come to their conclusions and, and many of the biases and worldviews involved. I've written many pages disputing a large number Pizzagate claims, including the ones you've brought up, on other websites in the past. It's extremely exhausting, and even more exhausting because it's so futile. No "knower of knowledge they don't want you to know" ever thinks or accepts they might actually be wrong about any of their extraordinary claims. If someone could compensate me for my time, I'd definitely be willing to spend many days disputing every single criminal plot you wish to present. I think it's very likely there are at least a dozen. Again, if you believe in one of them, you likely believe in many others - that's confirmation bias. No, I shouldn't have said "guaranteed to believe", but I think it's highly probable.
        jakeogh 7y ago
        This should be easy for you then. Is it normal for a man to tag an infant picture he posted #hotard? What are #chickenlovers?

meowface 7y ago

And?

jakeogh 7y ago
Is that a "no, I have not reviewed Jimmy Comet's instagram"?
- meowface 7y ago
  I have reviewed it and see no issue with it, or with any of the other Pizzagate claims. I believe Pizzagate is a complete hoax. As is "9/11 truth", which you have listed in your profile.
  - jakeogh 7y ago
    Ya totally normal tagging that baby pic #chickenlovers. Nothing odd at all about the "49th most powerful person in DC" tagging an infant #hotard. People should review the full archive, and his comments. RE distraction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21057230 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21057230
    - meowface 7y ago
      That's two posts you've made now saying that people accusing things of being conspiracy theories or presenting conspiracy theories are themselves in fact conspiracy theories to confuse people from learning the truth. Ok. Let me guess, I'm also part of the conspiracy? 9/11 wasn't an inside job. Comet Ping Pong isn't associated with pedophilia. The guaranteed dozens of other conspiracy theories you believe (Sandy Hook, Clinton body count, FEMA death camps, probably climate change denial) are also untrue. There's a reason why belief in one conspiracy theory almost always leads to belief in most or all of them, and why others don't want to try to debate with people such as yourself.
      - jakeogh 7y ago
        Excellent example of confirmation bias hacks. Note how you avoid the actual subject, and instead make it personal, and (without evidence) are sure of what I "believe". I explained why and how that works in the link I provided. Note again your reflexive use of that term. Is it normal for a man to tag an infant picture he posted #hotard? What are #chickenlovers?
        meowface 7y ago
        It's a very time-consuming task to point-by-point respond to every claim made by a person who dishes out near-limitless wild, extremely shocking accusations which are only ever taken seriously in essentially "underground" places, like this ghost of a comment sub-thread. There are often a gish gallop of dozens or more. It's the same process, be it a Holocaust denier, flat Earther, Sandy Hook false flag believer, 9/11 inside job accuser, or Comet Ping Pong child rape accuser. And yes, I do think it's fair and accurate to lump all of these together in terms of the faulty reasoning used to come to their conclusions and, and many of the biases and worldviews involved. I've written many pages disputing a large number Pizzagate claims, including the ones you've brought up, on other websites in the past. It's extremely exhausting, and even more exhausting because it's so futile. No "knower of knowledge they don't want you to know" ever thinks or accepts they might actually be wrong about any of their extraordinary claims. If someone could compensate me for my time, I'd definitely be willing to spend many days disputing every single criminal plot you wish to present. I think it's very likely there are at least a dozen. Again, if you believe in one of them, you likely believe in many others - that's confirmation bias. No, I shouldn't have said "guaranteed to believe", but I think it's highly probable.
        jakeogh 7y ago
        This should be easy for you then. Is it normal for a man to tag an infant picture he posted #hotard? What are #chickenlovers?