I don't want to get into an argument about specs either, because in the end all that matters is whether you can get the shot. From a technological standpoint th

I don't want to get into an argument about specs either, because in the end all that matters is whether you can get the shot. From a technological standpoint there is a significant difference between the 1/1.8" sensor or whatever those 108MP sensors are, and a 61MP FF sensor in a high end camera. How does computers doing eye tracking have anything to do with whether is is impressive that a handheld camera can do it? It is the implementation in a compact, low power device that is innovative. Re-framing the discussion to be about video here doesn't help your argument at all. Having fast autofocus means that you can choose how smooth transitions are, better autofocus just allows you to better control how your camera reacts to a situation. Sony doesn't have a small choice of lenses, they have the largest native selection of lenses of any mirrorless system and really have very few holes at this point. I don't know why you are comparing two compact 1" class prosumer point and shoot cameras when this discussion was about mirrorless cameras. Similar to RAW for stills, when it comes to video, if you really care about skin tones you will probably be shooting in log and doing your own colour grading or at the very least creating your own picture profiles with your preferred adjustments.