My opinion: not sure if he was guilty,but in the criminal case at least, the accuser (the state) failed to maintain integrity which casted doubt on the evidence

My opinion: not sure if he was guilty,but in the criminal case at least, the accuser (the state) failed to maintain integrity which casted doubt on the evidence they presented(the gloves thing for example) and if they were acting in good faith. There seems to be reasonable doubt of his guilt. Social politics aside, it is better for a criminal to go unpunished than for an innocent person to be punished wrongfully. If only everyone accused of a crime was given similar luxury of presumption of innocence, the media circus made a joke out of the process. It shouldn't have been televised. This is why it is important for police and prosecutors to have integrity and good reputation, else it will be difficult to catch or punish criminals.