3 ms·
While as a non-smoker I totally understand the sentiment here, as a scientist, that claim seems kind of unfathomable.
by rgbrgb 16y ago
While as a non-smoker I totally understand the sentiment here, as a scientist, that claim seems kind of unfathomable.
- artmageddon 16y agoHow so? Numerous studies have shown that second-hand smoke is very harmful: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/tobaccocancer/secondhand-smoke http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/tobaccocancer/seco... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/secondhand-smoke/CC00023 http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/secondhand-smoke/CC00023
- sophacles 16y agoIt's not the fact of risk, it is a question of level. Specifically, the statement "just as dangerous" is just not true. Dangerous yes. Equally so? No.