4 ms·
The "individual offices" aspect is interesting. Back in the 1980s and early 1990s, when Microsoft went from success to success and the corporate culture got re
by jdp23 16y ago
The "individual offices" aspect is interesting. Back in the 1980s and early 1990s, when Microsoft went from success to success and the corporate culture got really established, software engineering research showed that developers were more effective with individual offices and big monitors.
By 2005/2006, when I was looking at corporate culture at MS, things had changed: with the advent of pair programming and agile methods, many designers and developers are more effective in shared spaces -- and many prefer those environments. NOT cubicle farms, which are the worst of all world, and NOT large badly-designed open-spaces ... but there are plenty of other good options.
However, "individual offices" for devs is now such a status symbol for the teams that still have them, that people at the management level are very unwilling to change. One designer I know spent literally a year trying to get permission to get his 12-person team into an open space. In the end he gave up and eventually left the company.
- hackinthebochs 16y ago>with the advent of pair programming and agile methods, many designers and developers are more effective in shared spaces I'd be interested in seeing a source for this. I personally believe any creative endeavor is better performed in isolation.
- dpritchett 16y agoThe great thing about offices is that you can go sit in someone else's half the day if you need to collaborate on something.
- stevenbedrick 16y agoI just started a post-doc position, and for the first time in my career have my own office, and quite a nice one, at that. It is absolutely fabulous. Besides the obvious benefits, the biggest unexpected positive aspect of having my own office is that I can have a discussion with a student or co-worker without worrying about disturbing those around me.