4 ms·
From the linked paper: > the effect of chronic irradiation with a high dose of 222-nm UVC to mammalian cells has not been determined Please be careful in anno
by jiofih 7y ago
From the linked paper:
> the effect of chronic irradiation with a high dose of 222-nm UVC to mammalian cells has not been determined
Please be careful in announcing new truths based on your interpretation of a couple papers. That’s not how science is done.
- ebg13 7y agoYou're misinterpreting that sentence. They are talking about data missing from _prior_ work there. The title of the article is literally "Chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light induces neither DNA damage nor epidermal lesions" and a few sentences below the discussion of prior work they write "chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light was revealed not to induce mutagenic or cytotoxic effects in the epidermis".
- jiofih 7y ago> of rats